Blame the GOP for America’s First Marxist President.

Barack Hussein Obama has prevailed in the 2008 presidential election.  Obama not only carried all the ‘blue’ states that John Kerry won in 2004, he also flipped several ‘red’ states, such as Colorado, Nevada, Florida and Virginia, delivering a crushing electoral defeat to John McCain.  And the blame falls squarely on the GOP for allowing this Marxist to become president of the United States.

  It has been interesting and amusing to read the numerous ‘post mortems’ from conservative and liberal pundits alike.  Yet not one of the post mortems has identified the real reason McCain got clobbered.  It was not because of Sarah Palin, as many liberals claimed.  Palin was the only thing that kept McCain in the game.   It was not because middle America suddenly decided they like leftist solutions as opposed to conservative solutions.  McCain offered few such solutions himself.

  The reason Obama prevailed was because the GOP allowed a false narrative about Obama to stand – a narrative painting BHO as a moderate, reasonable, and competent legislator.

  First things First

  John McCain, for all his problems – deep distrust amongst conservatives, an unpopular Bush occupying the Whitehouse, an ill timed “fundamentals of the economy are strong” gaffe, and a less than stellar campaign team – could have put himself in a strong position to win with a single, courageous act: Opposing the socialist “bailout”.  What would have been proof of a genuine free market Maverick, willing to stand and fight big spending socialism, instead turned into a Monty Python skit.  McCain first ran with his instincts and stated he did not like the idea of a taxpayer bailout, then swiftly reversed himself – deciding it was his golden opportunity to “lead”.  He declared a phony “suspension” of his campaign and flew back to Washington to loudly promote this boondoggle.  By doing so, not only did he look contrived and silly, McCain ended up on the exact same side of the issue as Nancy Pelosi, George Bush, Harry Reid, the GOP leadership and Barack Obama.   And by being on the same side as Obama, his subsequent claims of prudent fiscal stewardship versus Obama’s ‘tax and spend’ liberalism rang exceedingly hollow.

  This episode cost McCain dearly.  After chipping away at Obama’s lead all summer, after the negative publicity surrounding Obama and Jeremiah Wright, and then introducing Sarah Palin to America during the Republican National Convention, the wind was at McCain’s back.  Palin hit a home run in her speech, and McCain appeared quite clever for selecting her.  The conservative base was starting to mobilize.

  Then President Bush and Treasury Secretary Paulson announced a financial ‘crisis’ to the world; and McCain (and the GOP leaders) crumpled like a cheap suit.  Granted, there were other footprints on his John Thomas, such as the Spanish language ads touting his amnesty plan, his foolish call for the feds to usurp individual mortgages, and his cringe producing knocks against “big oil”; all which helped erode conservative enthusiasm.  But the “bailout” debacle was the big one.  McCain not only missed the opportunity to side with the people (70% strongly opposed), but he tied himself closer to Bush at a time when Bush’s approval rating slumped from bad to worse.  Within 10 days, the polls dramatically shifted from McCain up from 2 to 8 points, to an Obama lead, which was never relinquished.

  That was John McCain’s main contribution to his loss (other than being John McCain), but the entire GOP, including the RNC, McCain’s advisors, the NRCC, the NRSC, and other various Republican organs failed as well.  They not only failed to win, but more importantly, they failed to prevent a dyed in the wool, radical Marxist from ascending to the presidency.  How?  By not telling America that Barack Hussein Obama IS a dyed in the wool, radical Marxist!!!  It is a nearly unforgivable crime to have failed to “put country first” and do everything in their power to keep this slippery and dangerous subversive from winning.

  Had they exposed Barack Obama for who he really is, instead of bowing to the winds of political correctness and decorum, Obama and his democrat allies would have been beaten like ugly, red-headed stepchildren.  Instead, they allowed Obama to dictate the narrative of his own life, knowing full well that the MSM was going to support him 100%.  The ads that the GOP did run mentioning Bill Ayers were sporadic, and mostly ineffectual, because they never followed up on why it mattered.  They never explained to the public that Bill Ayers is STILL a radical Marxist in every sense of the word, and was such when Obama ‘palled’ around with him.  They never explained that Obama and Ayers pushed anti-American, radical education “reform” together.  They never wove it into the larger story line of Obama’s entire life – a life full of radical associations, and his own Marxist activities.  And they failed to clearly demonstrate how that radicalism is setting Obama’s agenda this very day.  It was an EPIC FAILURE on the part of the GOP!

  The Real Story

  Talk Radio has a massive audience, but it is a self selecting audience.  Apolitical and swing voters generally do not tune in, and most liberals don’t either.  The only way for Obama’s real narrative to have reached the masses who don’t hang onto Rush’s every word, and who don’t spend their time reading Red State and Free Republic, was for the GOP hierarchy (including McCain) to raise hell about it.  It was the only way the MSM was going to mention it.  Instead we witnessed the spectacle of the RNC and McCain campaign scolding those in the Republican Party who tried to run such ads.  And when a very brave congressman, Michelle Bachmann (R-MN), appeared on Chris Matthews’ program and declared her suspicion that Obama may hold anti-American views, the NRCC pulled her funding and she was treated like a pariah in the party.  Not one GOP leader rushed to her defense.  It was a prime opportunity for Republicans to tell the world WHY Obama’s views should be considered un-American.  Instead, they cut and ran, just like they did from every Obama controversy.

  No matter how many uppercuts talkers such as Mark Levin, Rush, Hugh Hewitt, and Savage delivered to Obama’s chin, and no matter how much dirt the rightwing blogosphere uncovered, the powers that be in the Republican Party refused to join the fray, leaving the MSM to counter and gloss over anything negative about Obama that seeped into the national dialogue.

  The Republicans have lost their nerve.  Worse, they have lost their revulsion to socialism and Marxism and have devolved into politically correct, overfed capons.   No other explanation suffices to illustrate their frightened, AWOL status on the following subjects:

  • Obama’s mentor for roughly 10 years in Hawaii before he moved off to college was a man named Frank Marshall Davis.  Obama reveals “’Frank” as his respected mentor and adviser in Dreams of My Father, and recalls him fondly – nights of reading poetry together, drinking booze, and learning about the plight of blacks in America.  Frank Marshall Davis was a radical Marxist and racist - and a pedophile.  (Read all about Frank on Wikipedia here and in more detail from American Thinker here).

 

  • Obama, in his first book “Dreams”, bluntly stated that once in college he actively sought out radicals as his friends.  Quote:  “To avoid being mistaken for a sellout, I chose my friends carefully. The more politically active black students. The foreign students. The Chicanos. The Marxist professors and structural feminists.”   How many of these radical and Marxist friends did the MSM seek out for interviews?  Absolutely ZERO.  (Read “Obama’s Socialist Roots Run Deep” here).
  • Obama was a member of the New Party in the early to mid 1990s.  The New Party was a group of radical leftists founded in order to unite the Communists, the Socialist Workers Party, Community Organizers, and other various fringe groups into a more effective political party.  There are photographs of Obama proudly standing with its leaders and articles in their publications celebrating his state Senate victory, and his membership in the NP.  (More at Newsbusters here and Human Events here).

 

  • Obama’s African father, Barack Hussein Obama Sr. was a card carrying Marxist.  Though as a child Barack did not know his father, once older he began serious correspondence with him.  And he subsequently dedicated his first book to this man in 1995.  Obama Sr., amongst other things, advocated the “communal ownership of land and the forced confiscation of privately controlled land”, nationalizing foreign owned properties in his native Kenya, and “no limit to taxation if the benefits derived from public services by society measure up to the cost in taxation which they have to pay”.  Pure Marxism, and a heavy influence on Obama Jr.  (PrestoPundit has a good primer on Sr.’s marxism here.)
  • Obama’s very own mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, was also a dedicated leftist her entire life.   Obama credits her with having the most influence on his young life, saying “”the dominant figure in my formative years… The values she taught me continue to be my touchstone when it comes to how I go about the world of politics.”  She has been described by her friends as a “fellow traveler” – code word for communist.  (Townhall.com has more here).

 

  • Obama married Michelle Robinson.  While Michelle can certainly be charming, she had to learn on the campaign trail to not portray America as a greatly flawed and depressing country – which of course only her husband could fix.  Twice she stated she was “for the first time proud of my country” before such nonsense reached the media and she was forced to backpedal and whitewash.  Her admonition for women to reject careers in “corporate America” in favor of “community service” reeks of class warfare.  Her Princeton college thesis is pathetic race victim pablum sprinkled with hackneyed socialism. (Slate dissects it brutally here.)
  • For twenty plus years Obama (later joined by wife and kids) sat in the pews of Trinity United Christian Church, home of his “great friend and mentor”, Pastor Jeremiah Wright.  Everyone is familiar with Wright’s racist and anti-American rants that received some media coverage back in June.  However, the larger story is that Rev. Wright and his ‘church’ are devoted adherents to Black Liberation Theology.  Black Liberation Theology is a particularly noxious and ardently Marxist worldview.  And Barack chose this institution willfully and continues to heap praise on it, despite being forced to finally toss the good Reverend under the bus during his campaign.  (Much more on BLT here and here).

 

  • Barack Obama traveled to Kenya in 2006 as a sitting US Senator and campaigned (illegally so) for socialist presidential candidate, Raila Odinga.  Odinga was defeated, but due to his post election agitation, riots ensued and more than 1500 Kenyan citizens were murdered.  Kofi Annan brokered a power sharing agreement to stop the violence and Odinga was appointed Prime Minister.  This is a man who was so enamored with Fidel Castro that he named his first born son Fidel in his honor. (Newsweek’s sanitized essay on Odinga here, and the real Obama/Odinga story here from the Washington Times).
  • Obama, as we have found out from the unrepentant terrorist himself since the election, was much more than just “neighbors” with Bill Ayers.  According to Bill, they are “family friends”.  That Obama was blatantly lying about the extent of their relationship is inarguable.  But even the relationship that was ‘on record’, as political allies in Chicago politics, and allies in getting their education ‘agenda’ realized through the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, was highly exploitable.  For starters, Ayers may have quit advocating bombings, but he never once stopped advocating Marxist dogma, especially as it applied to education in America.  And Obama was in lockstep, going so far to give a glowing review of Ayers’ 1997 book, A Kind and Just Parent, praising the Marxist gibberish as “a searing and timely account of the juvenile court system”.  It has also been shown that there is a very real possibility that Ayers either edited or co-wrote Obama’s ‘Dreams’ book.  (NR’s Stanley Kurtz has more on the Obama/Ayers working relationship).

 

  • Obama has an ongoing relationship with Code Pink, the Marxist, anti-war outfit most famous for protesting outside of Walter Reed military hospital and at military recruitment offices.  Code Pink co-founder Jodie Evans was a principle Obama ‘bundler’ during the campaign, raising tens of thousands of dollars, and arranging events for Obama.  Even after Evans stormed the stage at a Palin speech and was arrested, the MSM refused to report on the links and friendship with Barack Hussein Obama. (FreeRepublic covered this topic best, here, here, and here).

The above close associations are only a partial list, for brevity’s sake.  But there are many others, including radical islamist and former black panther Khalid al-Mansour, a man identified by civil rights leader (and Obama supporter) Percy Sutton as ‘sponsoring’ Obama during his Harvard days.  Obama denies knowing him, yet al-Mansour and Sutton told the media the opposite.  Also, “close friend” Rashid al Khalidi, Black Liberation soulmate and anti-semite Louis Farrakhan,  his self described “spiritual advisers” such as the Marxist priest Father Pfleger and Reverend James “house niggers” Meeks, official campaign artist and Marxist propagandist Shepard Fairey, and Communist Party USA board member Tim Wheeler, who was honored by Obama with his own blog on the official Obama/Biden campaign website; all remained virtual unknowns.  It goes on and on.

So what prevented the GOP and the McCain campaign from exploiting the history of Barack Obama and telling the true story about his politics and worldview?  Shouldn’t the urge to prevent such a radical from gaining the presidency of this blessed nation have outweighed any fear of being labeled racists and fear mongers by Obama’s cheering section in the MSM?  Only a fool or a leftist could have been comforted by Obama’s attempts to sound notes of moderation during the general election.  

There was a reason that Obama received endorsements from North Korea’s official news outlet, Cuba’s Fidel Castro, Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez, the Communist Party in the US (CPUSA), France’s Socialist Party,  The New Black Panther Party, the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), the radical Palestinian party Hamas, British communist MP George Galloway,  Libyan dictator Momar Kaddafi,  Calyspo Louie’s Nation of Islam, Nicaraguan communist Daniel Ortega, and virtually every radical, leftist, socialist and Marxist organization in existence.

Yet the GOP leaders watched in silence as conservatives in the blogosphere and talk radio documented these endorsements and associations and tied them to his voting record and his current policies.  Policies that include radical gun control, giving out welfare and calling it tax cuts, pushing for surrender to the islamists in Iraq, lifting all restrictions on abortion, pushing an education policy right out of Bill Ayers’ handbook, using Marxist Saul Alinsky’s tactics for polluting the election process, threatening US sovereignty with global UN tax proposals and unfettered illegal immigration, his call for a powerful “Civilian National Defense Force”, his promises to gut missile defenses and many other high tech military systems, a radical energy agenda aimed at curbing fictitious “global warming”, and his proposal for nationalizing health care.

Fellow conservatives, next time you find yourself enraged about a far reaching, socialist Obama policy which erodes and undermines our military capabilities, our free market economy, our sovereignty, or our Christian heritage, be sure to thank the leaders in the Republican Party.  When it was time to stand and fight with us and expose the Marxist candidate to the American people, they chose the poisonous ‘safety’ of political correctness instead; to their eternal shame and to our nation’s catastrophic detriment.

16 Responses to “Blame the GOP for America’s First Marxist President.”

  1. ajmadison Says:

    Sounds about right.

  2. RMS941 Says:

    As always, you are are right on target. There is no question that he is a Marxist. GREAT! Job on this. Oh ya! the dirt bag Obama bought the election lock,stock and White House. Amount raised by 2008 presidential candidates: $1,599,797,97

  3. Spacewarp Says:

    Well, we have had a national election like we’ve never had before. For the longest time, the narrative was “If you vote third party, you’re wasting your vote.” Well, guess what, folks? It no longer has that sway.

    It’s time to make sure that we make it known and we have those who are able to work within the system to ensure that a new political entity is in existance.

    So, when are we getting this thing moving? The time is right.

  4. ajmadison Says:

    Spacewarp,

    You are absolutely correct. I bit my tongue regarding McCain during the homestretch of the campaign and focused on hammering Obama. Because as bad as McCain was, Obama is much worse. But now is the time to start hitting hard, and getting on the state ballots, and getting our message out big time.

    I’m working on a 4 page flyer that people will be able to download from this site and distribute everywhere. Also working with some conservative bloggers to get us linked.

    So things are going to hit full speed now.

  5. calperniaUSA Says:

    Not only did the GOP sit in silence, they insulted us even further with trying to repackage and sell us McCain. The politically astute knows him well. It was bad enough they expected us to support him to avoid a Marxist Administration; but they made the sell impossible by trying to sell a product that we knew wasn’t there.

    I couldn’t do it. I did a write in.

  6. ajmadison Says:

    Yes, the GOP money boys offered up Rudy McRomney to us as the choices. They blackballed the best man just when he started to show some movement. The whole thing was a nightmare. I will continue to support Reaganite GOPers but my days of supporting hacks that believe in the global warming fairy are long gone.

  7. gf Says:

    I would like to offer a different prospective. As a republican candidate who ran for state house of representatives, the state GOP did exactly the opposite. My opponent, an incumbent freshman democrat, has many personal issues promoted legalizing drugs, gay marriage, abandoning prisons for honor camps, voted against small business legislation, voted for increasing taxes and fees… The list goes on and on. My community which is made up of independent voters, also has the largest concentration of republicans in the state. I ran a positive campaign, staying away from attacking my opponent personally. Then, in the last weeks, the state GOP decided on their own to “help” me by dropping a series of mailers without my permission or blessing that negatively attacked my opponent personally. This negative attack caused a backlash in the community which ultimately cost me the election.

  8. Xenohistorian Says:

    Ajmadison, I’m still here. For the record, my state of Kentucky was the first to vote for McCain on Election Day. I must admit, I was surprised at the lack of activity here in the summer and fall months; maybe it’s because Sarah Palin energized the Republican Party’s conservative base. She got me energized, anyway. Aside from that, I agree fully with what you said in the above monologue. Now where do we go from here?

  9. John Wallace Says:

    Blame the GOP for America’s First Marxist President…

    Barack Hussein Obama has prevailed in the 2008 presidential election. Obama not only carried all the “blue” states that John Kerry won in 2004, he also flipped several “red” states, such as Colorado, Nevada, Florida and Virginia, delivering a……

  10. smoface Says:

    Thanks to your passionate essay,I am confident (and anxious) to send this off to the RNC, The Presidential Coalition, and the NRSC:

    Dear Sirs and Madams,
    I have been looking at these same four envelopes you sent me for over two weeks (three names but two are from the RNC). You’re waiting for my usual contribution. I’m reluctant to honor my pledge. I don’t think I should keep my promise since you didn’t keep yours. You did not give my party a legitimate honest conservative to compete with the likes of Barrack Obama and his very savvy campaign team. That’s what you were supposed to do. You might as well have been vacationing in the Bahamas for all the good you did. Even after it shook out that we were going with McCain, where were you guys? The man was like a lost soul circling the edge of Hades. Except for Sarah Palin, the rest sucked. There were 56 million of us who did not vote for Obama. None of that is to your credit. We are the ones that listen to talk radio, read and write the blogs, read three and four newspapers cover to cover every day. Scanning the internet, we are the ones connecting the dots… catching Obama’s endorsements from North Korea, Cuba, Venezuela, the US Communist Party, France’s socialist party, the Black Panthers, the Democratic Socialists of America, the Hamas, Kaddafi, Nation of Islam and Louis Farrakhan, and all the other radical, leftist, socialist and Marxist organizations in existence. We are the ones frantically e-mailing our family and friends, our congressmen. We are the ones in church praying for divine intervention~but you didn’t come. Obama’s stuff was out there for all to see, ridiculous restrictions on guns, welfare/under the pretense of tax cuts, ‘spread the wealth around’, sympathy to the islamists, wide-open abortion. You only had to get the word out to the hard working, non-political voters who just want the life they had yesterday, but you didn’t.

    Where were you when the congress strong-armed the rest of the republicans to give in to the 700 billion dollar bail out? Where was your leadership? The American people let you know we didn’t want it. Why didn’t you help McCain out there? Since he endorsed the bailout, he was the same as Obama. What’s Maverick about that? Why didn’t you tear open the story on the housing debacle as Congress’s mortal sin? And now that we are into the bailout, why isn’t somebody standing on somebody’s desk demanding accountability for that money? My 401K is cut in half because there is no leader taking us into a productive competitive capitalistic future. This recession could have been over in a year or two. Instead, there’s only the grim unknown. I have a Marxist to hand off to my children and grand children with no hope or promise things will get better for the first time in 250 years. And it happened on your watch.

  11. Lea O Says:

    I have been waiting for a year for something of substance to happen here. It now appears I will be waiting for another year.

    What prevented the Falcon Party from exploiting the history of Barack Obama and telling the true story about his politics and worldview BEFORE November 4, 2008?

    Hindsight being 20/20, I wonder how many would have been opposed to the so-called “bailout” or “loans” to the banks had we known then what we now know?

    While there are some disagreements on the exact date, it is now well known fact that:
    “a tremendous drawdown of money market accounts in the United States, to the tune of $550 billion, was drawn out in the matter of an hour or two.”
    Had the Fed not acted quickly that day… (9-11 or 9-18 makes no never mind)
    “…their estimation was that by 2 o’clock that afternoon, $5.5 trillion would have been drawn out of the money market system of the United States, would have collapsed the entire economy system of the United States and within 24 hours the world economy would have collapsed.” http://townhall.com/columnists/DianaWest/2009/02/12/who_attacked_our_economy_why_does_no_one_care

    There are and were many, MANY reasons to oppose McCain, but President George W. Bush was not one of them, IMHO. If the Falcon Party is just another “Hate Bush” site, I will not be visiting again.

    If you are a new party why not promote new ideas? Reagan is dead — let him rest in peace. We lost more personal freedoms during his 8 years than we ever dreamt of losing under President Bush.

    And as pertains to spending? US Government Spending as Percent of GDP during the Reagan years was 35.20%. During the 8 years of President Bush it was 35.46%. If you choose to remove the spending for 2008, which includes the “bailout” then spending drops to 35.29. Removing the numbers for ‘07 and ‘08, while facing a hostile congress and the need to fund our troops, the percentage drops to 35.26%. Forgive me if this is blasphemous to you, but .06 or .09 or even .26% does not make President Bush a drunken sailor compared to Reagan.

    Show me a list of Falcon Party candidates for 2010 and 2012, if we are permitted to hold elections, and leave Reagan and President Bush out of it. They are gone!

  12. Eric T. Says:

    I sure would like to see this party start to go somewhere.

  13. tim55 Says:

    What happened, I feel like I had a hopeful oportunity dangled in front of me, and now it appears to be dying on the vine…This country faces the greatest threat to it’s survival now, and those of us who believe in American Values and the ideals of our forefathers have still not stepped up and created a relevant party to oppose the two parties that are participating in our country’s ruination. When do we stop chasing the carrot, and do something….ANYTHING? Will we all succumb to complacency and allow our country to die? Will I be reduced to telling my grandson about how America used to be? God Almighty, don’t let this be the end…….

  14. whatsgoingon Says:

    This party has the majesty of multiple falcons.

    The more falcons, the more majesty.

  15. Redstater Says:

    So I posted part of this post and linked to it and guess who showed up?
    Frank Davis’s son.

    You can see his comments at my blog in the post “Things the GOP Should be Saying”.

    Thanks man… I have enjoyed your work since the Duncan Hunter Presidential run and know Russell also.
    Keep it up.
    -red

  16. tim55 Says:

    So, is there any word on when the Falcon Party intends to move toward relevance? Is there a list of possible candidates running for offices at local levels that the Falcon Party backs? Or is this another movement dying before it even starts?

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.